From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Dmitry <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 6/6] ext4: use bio layer instead of buffer layer in mpage_da_submit_io
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:33:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101025123353.GA16981@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tykavom7.fsf@dmon-lap.sw.ru>
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:16:16AM +0400, Dmitry wrote:
> > + if (bio) {
> > + bio_get(io->io_bio);
> > + submit_bio(io->io_op, io->io_bio);
> > + BUG_ON(bio_flagged(io->io_bio, BIO_EOPNOTSUPP));
> Definitly this BUG_ON should be converted to ext4_error or something
> similar, otherwhise writeback attempt to removed usb-stick will be fatal
> for a whole system. IMHO it is reasonable to skip this check at all,
> because all work will be done in ext4_end_bio() anyway.
> > + bio_put(io->io_bio);
Cut and pasted from XFS. From what I could tell from the block I/O
layer, the only time the buffer I/O layer should return BIO_EOPNOTSUPP
is if we pass it a discard or barrier request, and we're doing neither
here. So I don't think it should trigger on a removed usb-stick.
At the same time, it's not clear what good the BUG_ON() is doing here,
either. So perhaps we could could drop the BUG_ON, at which point we
could drop the bio_get() and bio_put() calls, too. To be honest I'm
not entirely sure why the XFS code does this.
Jens? Any reason why I shouldn't just remove the bio_get(), the
BUG_ON()check, and bio_put() calls?
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-25 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-23 20:40 [PATCH -v2 0/6] ext4: use the bio layer directly Theodore Ts'o
2010-10-23 20:40 ` [PATCH -v2 1/6] ext4: call mpage_da_submit_io() from mpage_da_map_blocks() Theodore Ts'o
2010-10-23 20:40 ` [PATCH -v2 2/6] ext4: simplify ext4_writepage() Theodore Ts'o
2010-10-23 20:40 ` [PATCH -v2 3/6] ext4: inline ext4_writepage() into mpage_da_submit_io() Theodore Ts'o
2010-10-23 20:40 ` [PATCH -v2 4/6] ext4: inline walk_page_buffers() into mpage_da_submit_io Theodore Ts'o
2010-10-23 20:40 ` [PATCH -v2 5/6] ext4: move mpage_put_bnr_to_bhs()'s functionality to mpage_da_submit_io() Theodore Ts'o
2010-10-23 20:40 ` [PATCH -v2 6/6] ext4: use bio layer instead of buffer layer in mpage_da_submit_io Theodore Ts'o
2010-10-25 5:16 ` Dmitry
2010-10-25 12:33 ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2010-10-25 13:05 ` Dmitry
2010-10-23 23:03 ` [PATCH -v2 0/6] ext4: use the bio layer directly Ted Ts'o
2010-10-30 19:10 ` Eric Whitney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101025123353.GA16981@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.