From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Cc: anthony@codemonkey.ws, arnd@arndb.de, avi@redhat.com,
davem@davemloft.net, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [v3 RFC PATCH 0/4] Implement multiqueue virtio-net
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 11:38:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101026093846.GA6766@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFBB51646E.01CC3630-ON652577C8.0030D6EF-652577C8.0031DA3C@in.ibm.com>
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 02:38:53PM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> Results for UDP BW tests (unidirectional, sum across
> 3 iterations, each iteration of 45 seconds, default
> netperf, vhosts bound to cpus 0-3; no other tuning):
Is binding vhost threads to CPUs really required?
What happens if we let the scheduler do its job?
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-26 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-20 8:54 [v3 RFC PATCH 0/4] Implement multiqueue virtio-net Krishna Kumar
2010-10-20 8:54 ` [v3 RFC PATCH 1/4] Change virtqueue structure Krishna Kumar
2010-10-20 8:55 ` [v3 RFC PATCH 2/4] Changes for virtio-net Krishna Kumar
2010-10-20 8:55 ` [v3 RFC PATCH 3/4] Changes for vhost Krishna Kumar
2010-10-20 8:55 ` [v3 RFC PATCH 4/4] qemu changes Krishna Kumar
2010-10-25 15:50 ` [v3 RFC PATCH 0/4] Implement multiqueue virtio-net Krishna Kumar2
2010-10-25 16:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-26 5:10 ` Krishna Kumar2
[not found] ` <OF5C53E9CF.FFDF2CE7-ON652577C8.00191D14-652577C8.001C2154@LocalDomain>
2010-10-26 9:08 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-10-26 9:38 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2010-10-26 10:01 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-10-26 11:09 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-28 5:14 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-10-28 5:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-28 6:12 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-10-28 6:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <OFC29C4491.59069AD1-ON652577CA.00170F0D-652577CA.001C76C8@LocalDomain>
2010-10-28 7:18 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-10-29 11:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-29 14:57 ` linux_kvm
2010-11-03 7:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-10-26 8:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-09 4:38 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-11-09 13:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-09 15:28 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-11-09 15:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-09 17:24 ` Krishna Kumar2
2010-11-10 16:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
[not found] ` <OF24E08752.2087FFA4-ON652577D6.00532DF1-652577D6.0054B291@LocalDomain>
2010-11-16 7:25 ` MQ performance on other cards (cxgb3) Krishna Kumar2
2011-02-22 7:47 ` [v3 RFC PATCH 0/4] Implement multiqueue virtio-net Simon Horman
2011-02-23 5:22 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-02-23 6:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-23 6:48 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-02-23 15:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-24 11:48 ` Krishna Kumar2
2011-02-23 22:59 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101026093846.GA6766@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.