From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] initialize unit id of IDE bus
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:23:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101026102354.GN2343@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3lj5lb8tu.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:29:49AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 08:06:13PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 06:22:12PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> >> Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:29:35PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> >> >> Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> writes:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Without this patch both buses on PIIX3_IDE device have the same unit id.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Are you sure that's wrong?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > So how do I know which bus is it on PIIX3_IDE?
> >> >> [...]
> >> >>
> >> >> Let me try to explain the IDE pointer thicket.
> >> >>
> >> >> piix3-ide provides two IDE buses. pci_piix_ide_initfn() stores them in
> >> >> PCIIDEState member IDEBus bus[2]. Technically redundant, because qdev
> >> >> stores child buses in dev.qdev.child_bus.
> >> >>
> >> >> IDEBus points back: qbus.parent.
> >> >>
> >> >> Up to two IDE devices can sit on each IDE bus. The first one uses
> >> >> IDEBus members master and ifs[0], the second one uses slave and ifs[1].
> >> >>
> >> >> ifs[i].bus points back to the IDE bus.
> >> >>
> >> >> {master,slave}.qdev.parent_bus point back to the IDE bus.
> >> >>
> >> >> Say you got an IDEDevice and want to know which to which of the two
> >> >> buses it's connected. Let's call it d.
> >> >>
> >> >> d->qdev.parent_bus is the BusState.
> >> >>
> >> >> Upcast to IDEBus: b = DO_UPCAST(IDEBus, qbus, d->qdev.parent_bus).
> >> >>
> >> >> b->qbus.parent is the IDE controller.
> >> >>
> >> >> Upcast to PCIIDEState: c = DO_UPCAST(PCIIDEState, dev, n->qbus.parent);
> >> >>
> >> >> If c->bus[0] == b, it's on the first bus.
> >> >>
> >> >> Else it must be on the second bus, i.e. c->bus[1] == b.
> >> >>
> >> >> Hope I didn't screw this up too badly.
> >> > Will check tomorrow if this works, but why not have simple property on
> >> > IDEBus that says which one is it?
> >>
> >> Because nobody has needed it so far?
> >>
> >> Does the bus care whether it's first or second?
> >>
> > User that wants to address particular disk cares.
>
> Define "user".
>
User is a guest OS.
> For users of qemu, the way to address a particular disk (or any qdev
> device) is by user-specified ID.
>
> For users within qemu, there are other ways.
>
Which ways?
> I'm asking whether the bus cares, because IDEBus holds the state of the
> bus. If the bus itself doesn't care whether it's primary or secondary,
> then this state should not carry that information.
>
Bus cares because devices on the bus are addressed differently depending
on which bus it resides on.
> >> > BTW what -device magic should I use to
> >> > create secondary disk on second IDE bus?
> >>
> >> Try -device ide-drive,bus=ide.1,unit=1,drive=...
> > Can I
>
> In qdev, we address buses by ID, just like devices. Unlike device IDs,
> which are specified by the user, the bus IDs are auto-generated. The
> secondary bus of piix3-ide gets the bus ID "ide.1".
Unfortunately those ids are meaningless from outside of qemu.
>
> We do have usability problems there. There is no way for the user to
> specify an ID for a default device, as far as I know. The bus IDs are
> defined by the device providing the bus. If it provides none, qdev core
> makes one up. This breaks down in corner cases. For instance, with -M
> isapc, we get two isa-ide. Each provides an IDE bus without specifying
> its ID. qdev core assigns the same name "ide.0" to both. bus=ide.0
> picks the first one (in not-really-specified qtree traversal order).
> As far as I can tell, there's no way to address the second one.
>
This looks like fundamental problem in qdev design. In my case bus names
assigned by qdev are useless even when done right though :(
> > Can I
> > instantiate ide-device on USB bus by doing -device ide-drive,bus=usb?
>
> -usb -drive if=none,file=tmp.qcow2,id=dr0 \
> -device ide-drive,bus=usb.0,unit=1,drive=dr0
> qemu-system-x86_64: -device ide-drive,bus=usb.0,unit=1,drive=dr0: Device 'ide-drive' can't go on a USB bus
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-26 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-24 16:23 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] initialize unit id of IDE bus Gleb Natapov
2010-10-25 14:29 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-10-25 15:42 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-10-25 16:22 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-10-25 16:49 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-10-25 18:06 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-10-25 18:20 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-10-26 9:29 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-10-26 10:23 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2010-10-26 11:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-10-26 12:32 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-10-26 7:28 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-10-26 9:14 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-10-26 10:15 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-10-26 11:20 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-10-26 12:12 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-10-26 12:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2010-10-26 13:03 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-10-26 14:15 ` Alex Williamson
2010-10-26 14:26 ` Gleb Natapov
2010-10-26 14:44 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101026102354.GN2343@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.