From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.10]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:39:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:39:23 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl Message-ID: <20101027143923.GA10534@fancy-poultry.org> References: <20101027141544.8754153etqb8q9s0@webmail.df.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101027141544.8754153etqb8q9s0@webmail.df.eu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] valid passphrase not accepted List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de On 27.10.2010, ts0@dotlike.net wrote:=20 > after rebooting i wasn=B4t able to unlock the luks-partition. > the luks header is there. the kernel configuration hasn=B4t changed > (all ciphers are integrated). the passphrase is valid but not > accepted. A shot in the dark: do you use the same keymapping when you're entering the passphrase as you did while LUKS-formatting the drive?