From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tansi.org (ns.km10532-04.keymachine.de [87.118.102.195]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:56:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gatewagner.dyndns.org (84-74-164-239.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.74.164.239]) by tansi.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8B8001218550 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:56:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:56:12 +0200 From: Arno Wagner Message-ID: <20101027155612.GA23215@tansi.org> References: <20101027141544.8754153etqb8q9s0@webmail.df.eu> <20101027143923.GA10534@fancy-poultry.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101027143923.GA10534@fancy-poultry.org> Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] valid passphrase not accepted List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de I am currently assisting the OP offline. Seems the LUKS header was overwritten in some fashion. Arno On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 04:39:23PM +0200, Heinz Diehl wrote: > On 27.10.2010, ts0@dotlike.net wrote: > > > after rebooting i wasn?t able to unlock the luks-partition. > > the luks header is there. the kernel configuration hasn?t changed > > (all ciphers are integrated). the passphrase is valid but not > > accepted. > > A shot in the dark: do you use the same keymapping when you're entering > the passphrase as you did while LUKS-formatting the drive? > > _______________________________________________ > dm-crypt mailing list > dm-crypt@saout.de > http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt > -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno@wagner.name GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F ---- Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans If it's in the news, don't worry about it. The very definition of "news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier