From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: r.schwebel@pengutronix.de (Robert Schwebel) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:44:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: imx: Add some core definitions for MX53 In-Reply-To: <20101027132213.GJ6017@pengutronix.de> References: <1288119235-7036-1-git-send-email-Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com> <20101027082958.GA6797@angua.secretlab.ca> <20101027090921.GB8554@pengutronix.de> <20101027102253.GA7822@angua.secretlab.ca> <20101027132213.GJ6017@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20101027234413.GD32583@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 03:22:13PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > That's a way we can go but only if the common name is not MX5 or MX5x. > We've done it with the mx21/27 and it failed when the mx25 came out > which was completely incompatible. And even worse, there is also the MX23 and MX28 in the meantime which are not i.MX at all: they are a design coming from Sigmatel, bought by Freescale and only named i.MX due to marketing reasons. rsc -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757197Ab0J0XoZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:44:25 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:33715 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751680Ab0J0XoX (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 19:44:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:44:13 +0200 From: Robert Schwebel To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Grant Likely , amit.kucheria@canonical.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, daniel@caiaq.de, Uwe =?iso-8859-15?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: Add some core definitions for MX53 Message-ID: <20101027234413.GD32583@pengutronix.de> References: <1288119235-7036-1-git-send-email-Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com> <20101027082958.GA6797@angua.secretlab.ca> <20101027090921.GB8554@pengutronix.de> <20101027102253.GA7822@angua.secretlab.ca> <20101027132213.GJ6017@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101027132213.GJ6017@pengutronix.de> X-Sent-From: Pengutronix Hildesheim X-URL: http://www.pengutronix.de/ X-IRC: #ptxdist @freenode X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Accept-Content-Type: text/plain X-Uptime: 01:41:18 up 116 days, 14:52, 16 users, load average: 0.01, 0.11, 0.15 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:215:17ff:fe12:23b0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rsc@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 03:22:13PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > That's a way we can go but only if the common name is not MX5 or MX5x. > We've done it with the mx21/27 and it failed when the mx25 came out > which was completely incompatible. And even worse, there is also the MX23 and MX28 in the meantime which are not i.MX at all: they are a design coming from Sigmatel, bought by Freescale and only named i.MX due to marketing reasons. rsc -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |