From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 19702] i5-450M CPU gets stuck in low/lowest state Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:14:47 GMT Message-ID: <201010291214.o9TCEl9b019808@demeter1.kernel.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19702 --- Comment #30 from Thomas Renninger 2010-10-29 12:14:38 --- Thanks. I still think not considering core dependencies in HW_ALL case is wrong, but this needs further/separate discussing/evaluation. Peter, as you said with exactly same HW and kernel version/.config: This one is broken: Intel Core2 Duo T7300 2.0 GHz processor and this one is not: Intel Core2 Quad Q9550 Could you show us: cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/available_clocksource and cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource does it make a difference switching, e.g. to hpet? echo xy >/sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource Ok, I checked Heinz's and Peter's dmesg: Heinz explicitly enables hpet via boot param (what is this for?) clocksource=hpet acpi_skip_timer_override And Peter has: Marking TSC unstable due to TSC halts in idle Switching to clocksource hpet It's always only CPU0 not switching up, right? Looks like something with hpet is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.