From: Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
To: b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org
Subject: Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Don't call sysfs_del_hardif() in atomic context
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:12:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010311712.07786.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201010311704.48893.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1769 bytes --]
Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> Linus Lüssing wrote:
> > sysfs_del_hardif invokes kobject_put, which might sleep. However, we
> > are not allowed to sleep during a call_rcu. There is also no need to
> > do the removal with an atomic call_rcu, as kobject_put only frees the
> > kobject when there is no more reference to it anyway.
> >
> > This commit basically revokes 7f32f2e8d97150ba5b80410dda86b01b0879fe8d,
> > despite not reintroducing the synchronize_rcu, our rcu_barrier should
> > handle this.
>
> This is an extreme bad idea as we would free the object before the rcu
> grace period is over. This would mean that any parallel run through the
> list would probably access memory which is invalid. So this is a good way
> to crash your machine.
>
> What makes you think that kobject_put sleeps? There is no code which proves
> it. The only reason would be that kobject_put -> kobject_release ->
> kobject_cleanup -> ... sleeps. Please complete that chain to show were the
> problem is. If it really sleeps then please only do the kobject related
> cleanup outside of call_rcu.
Found documentation about it in Documentation/kobject.txt
If you need to do a two-stage delete of the kobject (say you are not
allowed to sleep when you need to destroy the object), then call
kobject_del() which will unregister the kobject from sysfs. This makes the
kobject "invisible", but it is not cleaned up, and the reference count of
the object is still the same. At a later time call kobject_put() to finish
the cleanup of the memory associated with the kobject.
Please find another way to fix it - reverting
7f32f2e8d97150ba5b80410dda86b01b0879fe8d is no option (especially not when
removing rcu synchronization).
Best regards,
Sven
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-31 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-31 15:32 [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Don't call sysfs_del_hardif() in atomic context Linus Lüssing
2010-10-31 16:04 ` Sven Eckelmann
2010-10-31 16:12 ` Sven Eckelmann [this message]
2010-10-31 21:07 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] " Linus Lüssing
2010-11-04 13:31 ` Marek Lindner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010311712.07786.sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
--to=sven.eckelmann@gmx.de \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n@lists.open-mesh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.