From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bind-mount vs second mount of the same blockdev?
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 10:23:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101103102352.GB19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD12DED.3010902@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 12:39:57PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> mount -t ext3 /dev/block /mnt/a
> mount --bind /mnt/a /mnt/b
>
> versus
>
> mount -t ext3 /dev/block /mnt/a
> mount -t ext3 /dev/block /mnt/b
[snip]
> What are the differences in behavour?
None. Both lead to the identical states.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-03 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-03 9:39 bind-mount vs second mount of the same blockdev? Michael Tokarev
2010-11-03 10:23 ` Al Viro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101103102352.GB19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.