From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sirius.lasnet.de ([78.47.116.19]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEGpq-0005AM-6l for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:35:42 +0100 Received: from [2001:638:602:1183:21f:16ff:fe0d:7d41] (helo=excalibur.local) by sirius.lasnet.de with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1PEGoz-0007es-IY by authid with cram_md5 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:34:52 +0100 Received: from stefan by excalibur.local with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PEGoy-0003av-UW for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:34:48 +0100 Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 08:34:48 +0100 From: Stefan Schmidt To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20101105073448.GD3702@excalibur.local> References: <20101105010014.GA6115@denix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20101105010014.GA6115@denix.org> X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-KeyID: 0xDDF51665 X-Website: http://www.datenfreihafen.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.19 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stefan@datenfreihafen.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Moving to layered structure of openembedded metadata X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 07:35:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello. On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 21:00, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > That is already being discussed and decided. See the following previous topics > on the mailing list... To clear this up a bit. There can't be a real decision for now. Not all developers have been present at the OEDEM and we haven't discussed every detail their either. :) Most, if not all, people liked the idea during the OEDEM discussions, but we would need more input on problem that this may rise. As it stands I'm happy to see Khem coming up to put this on the ml. :) One I currently see is how we can keep it all working when the layers are maintained in different places and what kid of combinational explosion we will have with layers in different places. regards Stefan Schmidt