From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PEMWR-0007Ce-Oo for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:40:04 +0100 Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so2816161bwz.6 for ; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 06:39:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=OvvVNqT6xxCj/CwubPPkrUPVjRAgGDpMA8fxF+e5U60=; b=fCbzWhHYDBSc9AdJ4l/T2CdVddrsvwEnRa+kVrHHOy/lb8fYEefrIxHv0bnoaaixyf TfzVgpJ0zGojab4ww2k7VVQ+NsrxcNf7Qse4RJKDEb2GBRZgfUCsZSsbX7II91al1uQ8 SM00tP85PxcisfKLawwueCB5Tq8xqyDxgtvtw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=HAq5SVdq+NHdOGEqwRxFWOVe3EsPn3L4ETOXokujVdI5UmvRClDdLVySpBvWix2MmG VxIEpYCQe59mcyEyBoQyh/SlD9a4SeYggcmiUZfMaXZn3GA+yprtxRKzMxEXGHC2UEbd Z7J4eOwC+4WT06VxuLo52Sjo030TqFSCqTu2o= Received: by 10.204.62.203 with SMTP id y11mr1844633bkh.11.1288964349357; Fri, 05 Nov 2010 06:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (161-24.13.24.78.awnet.cz [78.24.13.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d12sm1001568bkw.7.2010.11.05.06.39.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 05 Nov 2010 06:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 14:38:47 +0100 From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20101105133847.GP3440@jama> References: <1288958934-18209-1-git-send-email-fransmeulenbroeks@gmail.com> <1288961484.3826.7.camel@mattotaupa> <1288963608.3826.15.camel@mattotaupa> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1288963608.3826.15.camel@mattotaupa> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.214.47 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: martin.jansa@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH] libX11: patch configure.ac so a nios2 system is not seen as an os2 system. X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:40:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 02:26:48PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > I agree. > > > Then if it is in the inc file, it needs to be taken out again when the > > next version comes. > > Sorry, I did not make myself clear. My point was if you could put > `configure.ac-nios2.patch` into `libX11/` or `files`. better not to use files at all http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-October/025673.html diet-x11_1.1.5.bb libx11-trim_1.1.5.bb will find it ok in libx11* dir, because of FILESPATHPKG .= ":libx11-${PV}:libx11" in libx11.inc but even when it's the same file I would keep it in separate dirs, because newer versions won't need it (hopefully) and then it will be removed with older versions. > > Hence it was put in the individual files. > > > > BTW it looks like upstream might go for a slightly different patch. > > I'll leave it to Martin to decide whether to go for that one or for > > this one (he is on cc of the upstream correspondence). > > Again, could you provide a link to that discussion. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2010-November/051731.html Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com