From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sirius.lasnet.de ([78.47.116.19]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PFjQr-0008KK-4S for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:19:57 +0100 Received: from [2001:638:602:1183:21f:16ff:fe0d:7d41] (helo=excalibur.local) by sirius.lasnet.de with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1PFjPv-0000qV-NN by authid with cram_md5 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:19:02 +0100 Received: from stefan by excalibur.local with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PFjPv-0004Ow-7V for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:18:59 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 09:18:59 +0100 From: Stefan Schmidt To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20101109081859.GE19935@excalibur.local> References: <20101104082759.GG19934@excalibur.local> <20101107182029.GP6691@excalibur.local> <4CD8083D.5080806@mentor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4CD8083D.5080806@mentor.com> X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-KeyID: 0xDDF51665 X-Website: http://www.datenfreihafen.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 78.47.116.19 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: stefan@datenfreihafen.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on discovery X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:20:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:19:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello. On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 07:25, Tom Rini wrote: > Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > > >On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:27, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > >>Its time for some house-keeping again. I know many people are working on > >>patchwork on-going, thanks for that. > >> > >>Looking throught it during OEDEM did still show up way to many entries. Some are > >>still from 2009. Next Saturday and Sunday I would like to reduce our current > >>count from 273 patches. 100 or less would be a nice goal imho. > > > >We are no down to a patch count of 186. With the new patches that came in the > >last two days that makes 100 patches that are gone. Most of them had already > >been applied or superseded by other patches and often were just missing a status > >update. > > > >For the outstanding patches I see three big groups which need our attention: > > > >1) Core/class patches: It would be great if some people more familiar with the > > core internals of OE could have a look at them and discuss outstanding issues > > or apply them. > > > >2) Stable/2009 patches: We still have patches sitting in patchwork for the > > stable branch. It would be great if they also could get some attention, not > > only patches for master. > > Would it be possible to get a list of patches that the folks (thanks > a lot for doing it, everyone!) who did the cleanup felt fit into > these areas? Let me try. Stable is easy to identify as it has a stable prefix in the patch. :) Stable: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2251/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2250/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2193/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1924/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1842/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1839/ Core: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/691/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/972/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1067/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3446/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3427/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3428/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3406/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3382/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3235/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3201/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3196/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/3139/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2933/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2592/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2563/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2558/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2555/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2526/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2248/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2200/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2171/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2491/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2487/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2094/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1978/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1926/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1907/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1858/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1828/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1741/ http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/1631/ I'm pretty sure that I have forgotten some. Many of them have already been discussed and often the outcome is unclear. regards Stefan Schmidt