From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Subject: Re: stubdom questions
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:48:48 +0100
Message-ID: <20101109204848.GN3448@const>
References: <4CD9341702000078000211AD@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4CD9341702000078000211AD@vpn.id2.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Jan Beulich, le Tue 09 Nov 2010 10:44:23 +0000, a =E9crit :
> - the build produces dozens of compiler warnings quite a few of which
> don't look benign at all?

On which parts? I guess updating them might fix these warnings, and if
not, issues should rather be reported upstream.

> - can't be built with a read-only and/or symlinked source tree?

I've never tried, actually.

> Also, what's the point of the install-stubdom dependency on
> install-tools? Shouldn't the individual components' builds be
> independent of one another?

I don't know why, but it's

changeset:   21760:84719437205c
user:        Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@citrix.com>
date:        Fri Jul 09 12:22:52 2010 +0100
summary:     Makefile: Serialise stubdom build after tools

Samuel