From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: agressive clocking framework v8 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:34:48 +0000 Message-ID: <20101110163448.GA27440@void.printf.net> References: <1288776170-10141-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <4CDAC787.3040005@stericsson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from void.printf.net ([89.145.121.20]:46904 "EHLO void.printf.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756898Ab0KJQex (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:34:53 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CDAC787.3040005@stericsson.com> Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , Ghorai Sukumar , Nicolas Pitre , Adrian Hunter , David Vrabel , Kyungmin Park , "jh80.chung@samsung.com" Hi Linus, On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 05:25:43PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > Chris, do you want an incremental patch or shall I spin an all-new > v10 patch? I think incremental patches make sense from here on out, now that it's in -next. We can decide whether it's worth performing any rebasing once the patch is looking complete, before it goes into mainline. Thanks! -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child