From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de
 [212.227.126.171]) by mail.saout.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
 for <dm-crypt@saout.de>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:10:54 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:10:55 +0100
From: Heinz Diehl <htd@fancy-poultry.org>
Message-ID: <20101112071055.GA6555@fancy-poultry.org>
References: <4CDC3C5E.1020108@gmx.at> <20101112012144.GA7616@tansi.org>
 <AANLkTi=u7uRnTKDjYG=X=GVfLQhUa6qoe1eeQ9a9JL6B@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=u7uRnTKDjYG=X=GVfLQhUa6qoe1eeQ9a9JL6B@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-crypt] Improving performance?
List-Id: <dm-crypt.saout.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/options/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.saout.de/pipermail/dm-crypt>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-crypt@saout.de>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt>,
 <mailto:dm-crypt-request@saout.de?subject=subscribe>
To: dm-crypt@saout.de

On 12.11.2010, dave b wrote: 

> FYI guys, there is a patch that hasn't yet been accepted into the
> linux kernel --->
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/244031/

Yes, we know :-)

AS far as I've read, it has one minor flaw which must be fixed before
it gets accepted and merged into the kernel. I have used it over some
months now, with good improvement and zero problems.