From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22Lorna_Gonz=E1lez=22?= <lorna.glez@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:21:08 +0100
Subject: [ath9k-devel] ath9k: Virtual interface as AP
In-Reply-To: <4CDC213D.5090407@candelatech.com>
References: <20101028074721.191890@gmx.net>
	<1288253027.23270.9.camel@jm-desktop> <20101111150634.288980@gmx.net>
	<4CDC213D.5090407@candelatech.com>
Message-ID: <20101112092108.202720@gmx.net>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org


Hi Ben, 

My scenario looks like this: 
wlan0 operates as an AP using hostapd and it is associated to aclient 
a wlan1 virtual interface is in managed mode and associated to an Ieee 802.11n AP. 
They share the same channel. 
When I measure the throughput with TCP streams in jperf I get following: