From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.37 1/2] ASoC: Fix dapm_seq_compare() for multi-component Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:10:45 +0000 Message-ID: <20101112191045.GH17283@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <1289577671-13837-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20101112210637.0ec2d25c.jhnikula@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EADB10396B for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:10:48 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101112210637.0ec2d25c.jhnikula@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Jarkko Nikula Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Liam Girdwood List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:06:37PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > This sounds feasible change. What I was thinking are there any > benefit which one, the register or codec is compared first but I don't > think there's any practical difference. > A1, B1, A2, B2 (now) > or > A1, A2, B1, B2 (codec comparison before register) If you've got two identical CODECs it will *probably* sound smoother to alternate between the two rather than enabling one then the other - there will be less time difference between any audible issues in each path. Probably a very small chance of that having an effect but it seemed more likely to do something useful than any other scenario.