From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: wkendall@sgi.com
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] xfsrestore: check for compatible xfsrestore
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 04:38:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101117093842.GI17317@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101116150705.423217632@sgi.com>
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:05:11AM -0600, wkendall@sgi.com wrote:
> When resuming a restore or doing a cumulative restore, xfsrestore
> reads state information left around by the previous invocation.
> This patch adds logic to determine whether or not restore is
> able to make sense of the sense information.
>
> The xfsrestore man page has also been updated to make the user
> aware of the requirement to use a compatible restore and
> system when resuming restores.
Shouldn't you use the opportunity to switch everything in the on-disk
layout to explicitly sized types? Seeing things like the bool types
in the persistant structures really scares me.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-17 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-16 15:05 [PATCH v3 0/9] xfsrestore dirent limitations and scaling issues wkendall
2010-11-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] xfsrestore: turn off NODECHK wkendall
2010-11-17 9:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] xfsrestore: change nrh_t from 32 to 64 bits wkendall
2010-11-17 9:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] xfsrestore: cache path lookups wkendall
2010-11-17 9:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] xfsrestore: mmap dirent names for faster lookups wkendall
2010-11-17 9:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-17 17:57 ` Bill Kendall
2010-11-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] xfsrestore: cleanup node allocation wkendall
2010-11-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] xfsrestore: fix node table setup wkendall
2010-11-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] xfsrestore: make node lookup more efficient wkendall
2010-11-16 19:20 ` Alex Elder
2010-11-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] xfsrestore: remove nix_t wkendall
2010-11-17 9:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] xfsrestore: check for compatible xfsrestore wkendall
2010-11-17 9:38 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2010-11-17 15:31 ` Bill Kendall
2010-11-23 13:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-11-16 19:21 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] xfsrestore dirent limitations and scaling issues Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101117093842.GI17317@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=wkendall@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.