From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Brett Rudley <brudley@broadcom.com>,
Henry Ptasinski <henryp@broadcom.com>,
Dowan Kim <dowan@broadcom.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] staging: brcm80211: brcmfmac: remove PCI SDIO controller binding
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:11:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101117221127.GB3851@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=p_iH32zads+9RwQGY+m7JK+FTmhBTth_x9ouK@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:00:16AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 09:58:46AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh_linux.c | 229 ---------------------
> >> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 229 deletions(-)
> >
> > Wait, is this really ok code to be removing from the driver?
> >
> > Brett and Henry, any objections to this?
> >
> > Mike, why do you think this is ok to remove? Is it because no one is
> > ever calling this even for both types of config for this driver?
>
> There's a lot of code in the brcmfmac part of the driver that tries to
> re-implement SDIO stack. In particular, the code removed by this patch
> registers a pci_driver for SDIO controller and then the brcmfmac
> driver accesses the WiFi device attached to that SDIO controller by
> means of custom re-implementation of SDHC.
Ok, so even with this patch, it will still work properly in the SDIO
mode?
Have you been able to test this?
Brett, Henry, I would like to get your ack on this before applying it.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-17 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-14 11:36 [PATCH 0/4] staging: brcm80211: misc cleanups Mike Rapoport
2010-11-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 1/4] staging: brcm80211: remove unused osl_pkt{get,free}_static Mike Rapoport
2010-11-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 2/4] staging: brcm80211: brcmfmac: remove PCI SDIO controller binding Mike Rapoport
2010-11-16 20:04 ` Greg KH
2010-11-17 7:58 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-11-17 21:10 ` Greg KH
2010-11-17 22:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-11-17 22:11 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-11-17 22:32 ` Brett Rudley
2010-11-18 7:39 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-11-18 7:39 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-11-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 3/4] staging: brcm80211: brcmfmac: remove PXA " Mike Rapoport
2010-11-14 11:36 ` [PATCH 4/4] staging: brcm80211: brcmfmac: cleanup bcmsdh_(un)register Mike Rapoport
2010-11-16 20:04 ` Greg KH
2010-11-17 8:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-11-17 21:11 ` Greg KH
2010-11-17 22:02 ` Mike Rapoport
2010-11-17 22:11 ` Greg KH
2010-11-19 19:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] staging: brcm80211: misc cleanups Brett Rudley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101117221127.GB3851@suse.de \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
--cc=dowan@broadcom.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=henryp@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.rapoport@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.