From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:37:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 00/51] some more imx patches for 2.6.38 In-Reply-To: References: <20101117212821.GF8942@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20101118073741.GG8942@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Shawn, On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 09:56:20AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > Hi Uwe, > > 2010/11/18 Uwe Kleine-K?nig : > > Hello, > > > > Some of the patches in this series are already in Sascha's tree, I > > resend them because several of them got minor fixes. > > > > The highlights are that for most devices for i.MX1, i.MX21, i.MX25 and > > i.MX27 are allocated dynamically which reduces the memory footprint of > > the kernel. ?Moreover I moved support for i.MX25 to mach-imx targeting a > > multi-SoC-kernel for i.MX. > > > > Later I want to do the same for mx3. ?I'm not sure about mx5 though. > > The discussion about integrating support for i.MX28 into mach-imx made > > me questioning if this is sensible. ?Well, we'll see. > > > You are moving mach-mx25 into mach-imx, will do the same for mx3, and > thinking about the same for mx5. But you are asking me to move mx28 > out of mach-imx. This only makes sense for me if you think mx28 will > not go into mach-imx forever. Are you sure about this? Otherwise we > are doing something really bothering ourselves. Yes, I think i.MX28 will never fit into mach-imx. Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |