From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dm mpath: add feature flag to control call to blk_abort_queue
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:48:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101118154807.GA15381@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101118072032.GA13390@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Thu, Nov 18 2010 at 2:20am -0500,
Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Mike S,
>
> Thanks for doing the refresh / update of the patch.
> I just did a quick test and did not see any issues but did have a couple
> of questions.
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1.) Should we bump the multipath targets version for this change?
Yes, not doing so was an oversight. I'll bump the version and post v3.
> 2.) A general question on the length of the feature name
> "abort_queue_on_failure" while the descriptive name is nice I noticed if
> I have two features that the multipath output line starts wrapping. I
> guess we could make the feature name shorter, but eventually if we added
> more features the line would eventually wrap so a shorted name will just
> stop wrapping now.
I'm open to other suggestions for the feature name.
I agree that we don't want feature names to get too long. But they do
need to be descriptive. So we need to have some balance. I could've
used "abort_q_on_failure" but I went for "queue" to maintain symmetry
with "queue_if_no_path". Similarly, abbreviating "failure" to "fail"
seemed like it didn't buy much (less clear?). *shrug* Maybe
"abort_queue_on_fail" offers a better balance?
As for the wrapping, I don't think there is anything we can do to avoid
it (given the current interface).
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-18 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-12 5:23 block_abort_queue (blk_abort_request) racing with scsi_request_fn Mike Anderson
2010-11-10 7:09 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Christie
2010-11-10 7:30 ` Mike Christie
2010-11-10 16:30 ` Mike Anderson
2010-11-10 21:16 ` Mike Christie
2010-11-12 17:54 ` Mike Anderson
2010-11-16 21:39 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-11-17 17:49 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Anderson
2010-11-17 21:55 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-11-18 4:40 ` [PATCH v2] dm mpath: add feature flag to control call to blk_abort_queue Mike Snitzer
2010-11-18 7:20 ` Mike Anderson
2010-11-18 15:48 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2010-11-18 15:48 ` [PATCH v3] " Mike Snitzer
2010-11-18 19:16 ` (unknown), Mike Snitzer
2010-11-18 19:21 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-11-18 19:19 ` [PATCH v4] dm mpath: avoid call to blk_abort_queue by default Mike Snitzer
2010-11-18 20:07 ` [PATCH v5] " Mike Snitzer
2010-11-18 20:18 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2010-11-18 20:39 ` Mike Anderson
2010-11-18 21:48 ` [PATCH] dm mpath: disable call to blk_abort_queue and related code Mike Snitzer
2010-11-23 1:00 ` [PATCH v2] dm mpath: revert "dm: Call blk_abort_queue on failed paths" Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101118154807.GA15381@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.