From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 1-1-12-13a.han.sth.bostream.se ([82.182.30.168]:37510 "EHLO palpatine.hardeman.nu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754224Ab0KRUnX (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:43:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:43:19 +0100 From: David =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E4rdeman?= To: Jarod Wilson Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Jarod Wilson , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Apple remote support Message-ID: <20101118204319.GA8213@hardeman.nu> References: <37bb20b43afce52964a95a72a725b0e4@hardeman.nu> <20101104193823.GA9107@hardeman.nu> <4CD30CE5.5030003@redhat.com> <4CE2743D.5040501@redhat.com> <20101116232636.GA28261@hardeman.nu> <20101118163304.GB16899@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20101118163304.GB16899@redhat.com> List-ID: Sender: On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:33:04AM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: >Mauro's suggestion, iirc, was that max scancode size should be a >property of the keytable uploaded, and something set at load time (and >probably exposed as a sysfs node, similar to protocols). I think that would be a step in the wrong direction. It would make the keytables less flexible while providing no real advantages. -- David Härdeman