From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:34:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]:34312 "EHLO mail-bw0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S1491875Ab0KSOeZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:34:25 +0100 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so4048862bwz.36 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:34:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=QfppuqDMucQuvSJAK5drXEMCdaWXZKatI+E5xOBrIY8=; b=mrAAZllHeLDOHWKLvLpMgR9CIX70xYmLEheWqYbPYi719EP97fd0fkhc7dZaliVAxh 7HPOOSYZI2ZvLfvYXbC0btjDtRX5bRyP0qqkOkq/uWLohDNq56aolpQtqcRdCEUb1/e9 +whsvOQdSQ6WbUh1t0/Gln4TzFRo2Qc4rpw8c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=AzOY2aM4+eGMCCQuAADWy6nZmxnNXguAxLc0yhVEX9oG+QBvFF2f9a3m+ZGVOgazr4 ICfyGi6oywQzsuSOqmxi3LwWpBVzVTu9eTT/RPuclaKAM5rsGJvx0g/ZQ/19SUMd0o7i JkjkiVvQJcTmaswWiJ3K0P349OqcFf2cY5oCI= Received: by 10.204.136.70 with SMTP id q6mr2120991bkt.208.1290177265312; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:34:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from nowhere (p549AACDD.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.172.221]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v20sm402564bku.22.2010.11.19.06.34.22 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:34:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by nowhere (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1000 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) fweisbec@gmail.com; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:34:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:34:21 +0100 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Deng-Cheng Zhu Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wuzhangjin@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org, mingo@elte.hu, acme@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] MIPS/Perf-events: Work with the new callchain interface Message-ID: <20101119143416.GA5558@nowhere> References: <1290063401-25440-1-git-send-email-dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com> <1290063401-25440-5-git-send-email-dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1290063401-25440-5-git-send-email-dengcheng.zhu@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 28434 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: fweisbec@gmail.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 02:56:40PM +0800, Deng-Cheng Zhu wrote: > This is the MIPS part of the following commits by Frederic Weisbecker: > > f72c1a931e311bb7780fee19e41a89ac42cab50e > perf: Factorize callchain context handling > 56962b4449af34070bb1994621ef4f0265eed4d8 > perf: Generalize some arch callchain code > 70791ce9ba68a5921c9905ef05d23f62a90bc10c > perf: Generalize callchain_store() > c1a65932fd7216fdc9a0db8bbffe1d47842f862c > perf: Drop unappropriate tests on arch callchains > > Signed-off-by: Deng-Cheng Zhu > --- Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker Why did I miss this arch? I did a grep on HAVE_PERF_EVENT or something, may be it hadn't it at that time? Thanks!