From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
Cc: akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: grab ops_lock before testing bd->ops
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:05:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101122100532.GA4693@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290419947.1272.16677.camel@rex>
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 09:59:07AM +0000, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:43 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > According to the comment describing ops_lock in the definition of
> > struct backlight_device and when comparing with other functions in
> > backlight.c the mutex must be hold when checking ops to be non-NULL.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>
> Acked-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
The problem was introduced by c835ee7f4154992e6cf0674d7ee136f5d36247a4
(that is in 2.6.29-rc1). Is this relevant for stable?
Best regards
Uwe
> > ---
> > drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c | 12 ++++++------
> > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c b/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c
> > index e207810..0870329 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c
> > @@ -197,12 +197,12 @@ static int backlight_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
> > {
> > struct backlight_device *bd = to_backlight_device(dev);
> >
> > - if (bd->ops->options & BL_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME) {
> > - mutex_lock(&bd->ops_lock);
> > + mutex_lock(&bd->ops_lock);
> > + if (bd->ops && bd->ops->options & BL_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME) {
> > bd->props.state |= BL_CORE_SUSPENDED;
> > backlight_update_status(bd);
> > - mutex_unlock(&bd->ops_lock);
> > }
> > + mutex_unlock(&bd->ops_lock);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -211,12 +211,12 @@ static int backlight_resume(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct backlight_device *bd = to_backlight_device(dev);
> >
> > - if (bd->ops->options & BL_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME) {
> > - mutex_lock(&bd->ops_lock);
> > + mutex_lock(&bd->ops_lock);
> > + if (bd->ops && bd->ops->options & BL_CORE_SUSPENDRESUME) {
> > bd->props.state &= ~BL_CORE_SUSPENDED;
> > backlight_update_status(bd);
> > - mutex_unlock(&bd->ops_lock);
> > }
> > + mutex_unlock(&bd->ops_lock);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
>
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-22 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-22 9:43 [PATCH] backlight: grab ops_lock before testing bd->ops Uwe Kleine-König
2010-11-22 9:59 ` Richard Purdie
2010-11-22 10:05 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2010-11-22 17:53 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2010-11-23 8:56 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101122100532.GA4693@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpurdie@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.