From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Subject: Re: bogus gfn - mfn - gfn - mfn checks in
	guest_physmap_add_entry
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:58:28 +0100
Message-ID: <20101124195828.GA22016@aepfle.de>
References: <20101123210158.GA9425@aepfle.de>
	<20101124102202.GF19638@whitby.uk.xensource.com>
	<20101124144138.GA25619@aepfle.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101124144138.GA25619@aepfle.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com>
Cc: Patrick Colp <pjcolp@cs.ubc.ca>, "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Wed, Nov 24, Olaf Hering wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 24, Tim Deegan wrote:

> > Another option would be to audit all callers of p2m_is_ram() and check
> > whether they can handle paged-out PFNs (which I though had already been
> > done but seems not to be).  Keir's VCPU yield patch might be useful in
> > some of those places too.
> 
> I think most if not all is caught by my changes already.

A quick grep shows there are a few places that need an audit wether or
not the paging types can be removed from p2m_is_ram().

Olaf