From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer) Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 10:07:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] imx: dma: remove SDMA_IS_MERGED In-Reply-To: <20101124201831.GZ4693@pengutronix.de> References: <1290626971-14863-1-git-send-email-fabio.estevam@freescale.com> <20101124194439.GY4693@pengutronix.de> <20101124201831.GZ4693@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20101125090707.GR6017@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 09:18:31PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 06:07:18PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Uwe, > > > > 2010/11/24 Uwe Kleine-K?nig : > > > Hello Fabio, > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:29:31PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > >> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam > > >> --- > > >> This allows imx-for-2.6.38 tree to build again. > > > The same patch is already in Sascha's imx-for-2.6.37 branch (and so in > > > for-next, too). ?There are some more fixes in for-.37 so I'd use the > > > for-next branch for now. > > > > Thanks, I haven't noticed this. Will use for-next branch for now. > > > > While at the dma topic: is anyone able to boot a kernel on MX51 with > > IMX_SDMA=y? > > > > I enabled early printk support, but no kernel messages appear after: > > Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel. > > > > This also happens on the for-next branch. > I usually prefer just using DEBUG_LL and put > > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LL > void printch(char); > printch(c); > #endif > > into emit_log_char. But I think that's only because I don't know how to > use early printk properly. (You might need an additional kernel > parameter?!) Yes, 'earlyprintk'. -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |