From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: numa_get_mems_allowed bug
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:35:11 +0100
Message-ID: <20101129193510.GC15763@basil.fritz.box>
References: <AANLkTi=hURt9Sq7ZB3YMtb_B3mpedbbyyu6GLTLcGEOg@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTi=2atfbYrA7+ffB4yJthCkFxKw72vYz1g9qQvFD@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=2atfbYrA7+ffB4yJthCkFxKw72vYz1g9qQvFD@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-numa.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Michael Spiegel <michael.m.spiegel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-numa@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 02:19:29PM -0500, Michael Spiegel wrote:
> To stimulate some discussion, here is the patch file for the issue.
> It does the appropriate error checking.  The patch does not use
> getpol(), my question was whether it should call the function or not.

Patch looks good to me. getpol() is just a utility function.
-Andi