From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Hal V. Engel" Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:08:09 -0800 References: <201011200024.33623.hvengel@gmail.com> <4CF57392.3010305@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CF57392.3010305@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011301408.09853.hvengel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] Last OP Meeting - Tue - 9 November 2010 - The Recording List-Id: Printing architecture under linux List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Till Kamppeter Cc: printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org On Tuesday, November 30, 2010 01:58:42 pm Till Kamppeter wrote: > On 11/20/2010 09:24 AM, Hal V. Engel wrote: > > I think that this assessment is basically correct. Intel/Meego might be > > more likely to respond to this than Nokia. Also the current CPD is tied > > to KDE and I think it would be better to decouple it from KDE and make > > it a generic/native Qt app. This would in the long run make it more > > attractive to Nokia/Intel and other Meego vendors while at the same time > > supporting KDE. If anything this should result in wider use of the CPD. > > > > I have a contact at Intel who is part of the Meego team. I am not sure > > if he can help but I will contact him to see if there is any interest. > > Probably will not go anywhere but it can't hurt to try. > > Hal, did you contact these people? Did you get any answer? > > Till I just sent an email a few days ago. Have not heard anything yet. Hal