From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vasily Khoruzhick Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set,get}_pull callbacks Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:01:02 +0200 Message-ID: <201011301701.03443.anarsoul@gmail.com> References: <000201cb8fae$4d61fd20$e825f760$%kim@samsung.com> <201011301633.05545.anarsoul@gmail.com> <4CF50FD5.1090705@metafoo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f66.google.com ([209.85.215.66]:56641 "EHLO mail-ew0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752837Ab0K3PBh (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 10:01:37 -0500 Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so1369950ewy.1 for ; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:01:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4CF50FD5.1090705@metafoo.de> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: Kukjin Kim , 'Ben Dooks' , 'Russell King' , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, 'Abdoulaye Walsimou GAYE' On Tuesday 30 November 2010 16:53:09 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > Both the cpu init code and the machine init code are run at arch_initcall. Yeah, you're right. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: anarsoul@gmail.com (Vasily Khoruzhick) Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 17:01:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH RESEND v3] ARM: s3c2442: Setup gpio {set, get}_pull callbacks In-Reply-To: <4CF50FD5.1090705@metafoo.de> References: <000201cb8fae$4d61fd20$e825f760$%kim@samsung.com> <201011301633.05545.anarsoul@gmail.com> <4CF50FD5.1090705@metafoo.de> Message-ID: <201011301701.03443.anarsoul@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tuesday 30 November 2010 16:53:09 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > Both the cpu init code and the machine init code are run at arch_initcall. Yeah, you're right.