From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Convert s3c_irqext_wake() to new irq_ interrupt methods Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:47:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20101201114755.GC5688@sirena.org.uk> References: <1290698309-7691-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20101201101902.GA22683@mail.wantstofly.org> <20101201110827.GB24176@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <20101201114531.GK15575@mail.wantstofly.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:48010 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751408Ab0LALsD (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 06:48:03 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101201114531.GK15575@mail.wantstofly.org> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Lennert Buytenhek Cc: Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 12:45:31PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > My mistake, sorry -- I thought you had missed the two uses of > s3c_irqext_wake in ./mach-s3c64xx/irq-eint.c and ./plat-s3c24xx/irq.c, > but your patch does actually fix those up as well. No problem, no wonder I couldn't figure out what you were talking about! From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 11:47:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: SAMSUNG: Convert s3c_irqext_wake() to new irq_ interrupt methods In-Reply-To: <20101201114531.GK15575@mail.wantstofly.org> References: <1290698309-7691-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20101201101902.GA22683@mail.wantstofly.org> <20101201110827.GB24176@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <20101201114531.GK15575@mail.wantstofly.org> Message-ID: <20101201114755.GC5688@sirena.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 12:45:31PM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > My mistake, sorry -- I thought you had missed the two uses of > s3c_irqext_wake in ./mach-s3c64xx/irq-eint.c and ./plat-s3c24xx/irq.c, > but your patch does actually fix those up as well. No problem, no wonder I couldn't figure out what you were talking about!