From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] ASoC: tlv320dac33: Request for reordered update power sequence Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 13:15:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20101202131505.GE859@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <1291291390-8669-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> <1291291390-8669-3-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> <20101202122423.GB859@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <201012021452.04720.peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com (opensource.wolfsonmicro.com [80.75.67.52]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D3E10383E for ; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:15:07 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201012021452.04720.peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Liam Girdwood List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 02:52:04PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Back to the naming.. What about reorder_dapm_update_power, and move the flag to > the snd_soc_dapm_widget struct? If we're going down this route I'd rather have a name that reflected the new ordering rather than the fact that there's an ordering change. Not that any ideas occur to me right now.