From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de (metis.ext.pengutronix.de [92.198.50.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 128BF1007D2 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 02:50:37 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:50:31 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Stefan Roese Subject: Re: UIO / of_genirq driver Message-ID: <20101203155031.GC5636@pengutronix.de> References: <1d3f23371001272313i62fc9158se4cd9173f196fb12@mail.gmail.com> <20100128104545.GA3105@pengutronix.de> <201012031643.31428.sr@denx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh" In-Reply-To: <201012031643.31428.sr@denx.de> Cc: hjk@linutronix.de, devicetree-discuss , gregkh@suse.de, Linux Kernel list , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, John Williams List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Is there any update on this in the meantime? Do you know of any plans to = re- > work/-push this patchset? Just checking... I had another look recently; I wouldn't like to just copy/paste the "new_id"-mechanism from PCI because the code would then exist three times in the kernel (PCMCIA being the third user I am aware of). I wondered if it was feasible to make the "new-id"-code generic and make those subsystems just use it. I haven't started working on it, though. Kind regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkz5EccACgkQD27XaX1/VRuMWQCdF8iOdjY8DK3GeACA1YbVY/qX oVkAniWPpN9kz0GSvHQJuDUZ18Jf0OgD =8Ygy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752015Ab0LCPul (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:50:41 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:47210 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751366Ab0LCPuk (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:50:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:50:31 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Stefan Roese Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, John Williams , gregkh@suse.de, devicetree-discuss , hjk@linutronix.de, Linux Kernel list Subject: Re: UIO / of_genirq driver Message-ID: <20101203155031.GC5636@pengutronix.de> References: <1d3f23371001272313i62fc9158se4cd9173f196fb12@mail.gmail.com> <20100128104545.GA3105@pengutronix.de> <201012031643.31428.sr@denx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201012031643.31428.sr@denx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:221:70ff:fe71:1890 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: w.sang@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Is there any update on this in the meantime? Do you know of any plans to = re- > work/-push this patchset? Just checking... I had another look recently; I wouldn't like to just copy/paste the "new_id"-mechanism from PCI because the code would then exist three times in the kernel (PCMCIA being the third user I am aware of). I wondered if it was feasible to make the "new-id"-code generic and make those subsystems just use it. I haven't started working on it, though. Kind regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkz5EccACgkQD27XaX1/VRuMWQCdF8iOdjY8DK3GeACA1YbVY/qX oVkAniWPpN9kz0GSvHQJuDUZ18Jf0OgD =8Ygy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: UIO / of_genirq driver Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 16:50:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20101203155031.GC5636@pengutronix.de> References: <1d3f23371001272313i62fc9158se4cd9173f196fb12@mail.gmail.com> <20100128104545.GA3105@pengutronix.de> <201012031643.31428.sr@denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8779531679019186730==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201012031643.31428.sr@denx.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppe-linuxppc-embedded-2=m.gmane.org@lists.ozlabs.org To: Stefan Roese Cc: hjk@linutronix.de, devicetree-discuss , gregkh@suse.de, Linux Kernel list , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, John Williams List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --===============8779531679019186730== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh" Content-Disposition: inline --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Is there any update on this in the meantime? Do you know of any plans to = re- > work/-push this patchset? Just checking... I had another look recently; I wouldn't like to just copy/paste the "new_id"-mechanism from PCI because the code would then exist three times in the kernel (PCMCIA being the third user I am aware of). I wondered if it was feasible to make the "new-id"-code generic and make those subsystems just use it. I haven't started working on it, though. Kind regards, Wolfram --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkz5EccACgkQD27XaX1/VRuMWQCdF8iOdjY8DK3GeACA1YbVY/qX oVkAniWPpN9kz0GSvHQJuDUZ18Jf0OgD =8Ygy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WfZ7S8PLGjBY9Voh-- --===============8779531679019186730== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev --===============8779531679019186730==--