From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D174C80A74 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2010 10:06:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2010 08:06:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,305,1288594800"; d="scan'208";a="633563362" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.255.16.43]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2010 08:06:52 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton Organization: Intel Corporation (UK) To: poky@yoctoproject.org Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 16:06:45 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-23-generic-pae; KDE/4.5.1; i686; ; ) References: <201012031634.56033.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> <1291414305.14277.2746.camel@rex> In-Reply-To: <1291414305.14277.2746.camel@rex> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201012061606.45790.paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: sstate status X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 16:06:54 -0000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Friday 03 December 2010 22:11:45 Richard Purdie wrote: > I notice a number of patches in your branches which shouldn't be needed > if we use the two patches at the head of: > > http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=rpurdie/tweaks2 > > Could you please test using those two changes, or let me know if those > changes cause problems. I just tested with your branch; it definitely obviates the need to exclude large amounts of variables, however BB_TASKHASH is still being included in the hash and this causes many mismatches. Cheers, Paul