From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 05/10] mm: Remove likely() from grab_cache_page_write_begin()
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:58:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101207021329.476854013@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20101207015834.196176991@goodmis.org
[-- Attachment #1: 0005-mm-Remove-likely-from-grab_cache_page_write_begin.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2405 bytes --]
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Running the annotated branch profiler on a box doing average work
(firefox, evolution, xchat, distcc farm), the likely() used in
grab_cache_page_write_begin() was incorrect most of the time:
correct incorrect % Function File Line
------- --------- - -------- ---- ----
1924262 71332401 97 grab_cache_page_write_begin filemap.c 2206
Adding a trace_printk() and running the function tracer limited to
just this function I can see:
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268935: grab_cache_page_write_begin: page= (null) mapping=ffff8800676a9460 index=7
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268946: grab_cache_page_write_begin <-ext3_write_begin
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268947: grab_cache_page_write_begin: page= (null) mapping=ffff8800676a9460 index=8
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268959: grab_cache_page_write_begin <-ext3_write_begin
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268960: grab_cache_page_write_begin: page= (null) mapping=ffff8800676a9460 index=9
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268972: grab_cache_page_write_begin <-ext3_write_begin
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268973: grab_cache_page_write_begin: page= (null) mapping=ffff8800676a9460 index=10
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268991: grab_cache_page_write_begin <-ext3_write_begin
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.268992: grab_cache_page_write_begin: page= (null) mapping=ffff8800676a9460 index=11
gconfd-2-2696 [000] 4467.269005: grab_cache_page_write_begin <-ext3_write_begin
Which shows that a lot of calls from ext3_write_begin will result in
the page returned by "find_lock_page" will be NULL.
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index ea89840..d557fe7 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2218,7 +2218,7 @@ struct page *grab_cache_page_write_begin(struct address_space *mapping,
gfp_notmask = __GFP_FS;
repeat:
page = find_lock_page(mapping, index);
- if (likely(page))
+ if (page)
return page;
page = __page_cache_alloc(mapping_gfp_mask(mapping) & ~gfp_notmask);
--
1.7.2.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-07 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-07 1:58 [RFC][PATCH 00/10] incorrect unlikely() and likely() cleanups Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/10] sched: Change rt_task(prev) in pre_schedule_rt to likely Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 3:25 ` Yong Zhang
2010-12-07 3:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/10] mm: Remove likely() from mapping_unevictable() Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 2:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 7:02 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 13:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 16:26 ` Rik van Riel
2010-12-10 7:00 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-12-10 7:06 ` Joe Perches
2010-12-10 8:08 ` Miles Bader
2010-12-11 0:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/10] workqueue: It is likely that WORKER_NOT_RUNNING is true Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 9:49 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-07 13:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-11 0:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-11 0:09 ` Tejun Heo
2010-12-11 0:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/10] sched: Change pick_next_task_rt from unlikely to likely Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 2:46 ` Gregory Haskins
2010-12-07 2:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-11 0:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2010-12-07 2:24 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/10] mm: Remove likely() from grab_cache_page_write_begin() Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 6:56 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/10] sched: Remove unlikely() from rt_policy() in sched.c Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/10] x86: Remove unlikey()s from sched_switch segment tests Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/10] fs: Remove unlikely() from fput_light() Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/10] fs: Remove unlikely() from fget_light() Steven Rostedt
2010-12-07 1:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/10] sched: Remove unlikely() from ttwu_post_activation Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101207021329.476854013@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.