From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: buggy perf callgraph output
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 22:48:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101208214809.GG1709@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101208164015.GA5444@amd>
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 03:40:15AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get strange looking perf output with the callchain hits not sorted
> properly for graph and fractal:
>
> 7.34% open [kernel.kallsyms] [k] kmem_cache_alloc
> |
> --- kmem_cache_alloc
> |
> |---0.05%-- get_empty_filp
> | do_filp_open
> | do_sys_open
> | sys_open
> | system_call
> | __open_nocancel
> |
> ---0.16%-- getname
> do_sys_open
> sys_open
> system_call
> __open_nocancel
>
> 6.17% open [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock
> |
> --- _raw_spin_lock
> |
> |---0.01%-- add_partial
> | __slab_free
> | kmem_cache_free
> | file_free_rcu
> | __rcu_process_callbacks
> | rcu_process_callbacks
> | __do_softirq
> | call_softirq
> | do_softirq
> | irq_exit
> | smp_apic_timer_interrupt
> | apic_timer_interrupt
> |
> |---0.16%-- dput
> | |
> | --0.57%-- fput
> | filp_close
> | sys_close
> | system_call
> | __libc_close
> |
> |--0.60%-- link_path_walk
> | do_path_lookup
> | do_filp_open
> | do_sys_open
> | sys_open
> | system_call
> | __open_nocancel
> |
> |--0.57%-- __slab_free
> | kmem_cache_free
> | file_free_rcu
> | __rcu_process_callbacks
> | rcu_process_callbacks
> | __do_softirq
>
>
> With flat it looks a bit better:
> 7.34% open [kernel.kallsyms] [k] kmem_cache_alloc
> 6.09%
> kmem_cache_alloc
> get_empty_filp
> do_filp_open
> do_sys_open
> sys_open
> system_call
> __open_nocancel
>
> 1.07%
> kmem_cache_alloc
> getname
> do_sys_open
> sys_open
> system_call
> __open_nocancel
>
> 6.17% open [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock
> 0.60%
> _raw_spin_lock
> link_path_walk
> do_path_lookup
> do_filp_open
> do_sys_open
> sys_open
> system_call
> __open_nocancel
>
> 0.57%
> _raw_spin_lock
> fd_install
> do_sys_open
> sys_open
> system_call
> __open_nocancel
>
> 0.57%
> _raw_spin_lock
> dput
> fput
> filp_close
> sys_close
> system_call
> __libc_close
I can not reproduce it. Could you please try to reproduce,
run perf archive and send me your perf.data.tar.bz2 ?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-08 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-08 16:40 buggy perf callgraph output Nick Piggin
2010-12-08 21:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-12-15 13:02 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-16 11:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-17 5:32 ` Nick Piggin
2010-12-23 12:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-12-23 13:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-12-23 13:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101208214809.GG1709@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.