From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] kthread: NUMA aware kthread_create_on_cpu()
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:44:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101209164438.fae1ba4c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291043695.3435.980.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:14:55 +0100
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> All kthreads being created from a single helper task, they all use
> memory from a single node for their kernel stack and task struct.
>
> This patch suite creates kthread_create_on_cpu(), adding a 'cpu'
> parameter to parameters already used by kthread_create().
>
> This parameter serves in allocating memory for the new kthread on its
> memory node if possible.
The name "kthread_create_on_cpu" is pretty misleading.
One would expect such a function to create a kthread which is bound to
that CPU. But what it in fact does is to create a kthread which is
bound to all CPUs and whose stack, task_struct and thread_info were
allocated from the node which contains `cpu'.
Also, a saner interface would be one which takes the numa_node_id, not
the cpu number.
>
> ...
>
> /**
> - * kthread_create - create a kthread.
> + * kthread_create_on_cpu - create a kthread.
> * @threadfn: the function to run until signal_pending(current).
> * @data: data ptr for @threadfn.
> + * @cpu: cpu number.
> * @namefmt: printf-style name for the thread.
> *
> * Description: This helper function creates and names a kernel
> * thread. The thread will be stopped: use wake_up_process() to start
> * it. See also kthread_run().
> *
> + * If thread is going to be bound on a particular cpu, give its number
> + * in @cpu, to get NUMA affinity for kthread stack, or else give -1.
This is a bit presumptuous. The caller might wish to later bind this
thread to some or all of the CPUs on the node, rather than to a single
CPU (eg, kswapd()).
So what to do? Maybe add a new kthread_create_node() which prepares a
kthread whose memory is bound to that node, then add a
kthread_create_cpu() convenience wrapper around that?
>
> ...
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-10 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-28 19:33 [PATCH] kthread: NUMA aware kthread_create_on_cpu() Eric Dumazet
2010-11-28 22:40 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-28 22:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-28 23:01 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-28 23:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 9:05 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-29 9:38 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] " Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 16:09 ` Andi Kleen
2010-11-29 17:39 ` David Miller
2010-11-29 17:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 23:31 ` Rusty Russell
2010-11-29 15:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: NUMA aware alloc_task_struct_node() Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: NUMA aware alloc_thread_info_node() Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] kthread: NUMA aware kthread_create_on_cpu() Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 0:44 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-12-10 5:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 6:32 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-10 7:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-10 7:09 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-13 6:26 ` Thomas Fjellstrom
2010-11-29 15:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] kthread: use kthread_create_on_cpu() Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 15:19 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-30 9:38 ` David Howells
2010-11-30 9:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-29 9:03 ` [PATCH] kthread: NUMA aware kthread_create_on_cpu() Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101209164438.fae1ba4c.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.