Re: linux-next: Tree for December 6 (pch_uart)

[Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>]

On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 08:14:22 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:

> On Mon, 6 Dec 2010 16:09:33 +0100 Zimny Lech wrote:
> 
> > Ave,
> > 
> > 2010/12/6 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > [The mirroring on kernel.org is currently being slow, so this release may
> > > not be available yet.]
> > >
> > > Changes since 20101203:
> > >
> > 
> > Nothing new here, only known issues
> > 
> > Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready  (#5)
> >   Building modules, stage 2.
> >   MODPOST 314 modules
> > ERROR: "dma_release_channel" [drivers/serial/pch_uart.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: "__dma_request_channel" [drivers/serial/pch_uart.ko] undefined!
> > WARNING: modpost: Found 4 section mismatch(es).
> > To see full details build your kernel with:
> > 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y'
> > make[2]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2
> > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> 
> Greg, are you going to merge the patch that I posted for this one?
> 

ping.  Still happening in linux-next 20101210.


> 
> 
> > WARNING: modpost: Found 9 section mismatch(es).
> > To see full details build your kernel with:
> > 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y'
> >   GEN     .version
> >   CHK     include/generated/compile.h
> >   UPD     include/generated/compile.h
> >   CC      init/version.o
> >   LD      init/built-in.o
> >   LD      .tmp_vmlinux1
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `pch_uart_startup':
> > pch_uart.c:(.text+0x102efc): undefined reference to `__dma_request_channel'
> > pch_uart.c:(.text+0x102f46): undefined reference to `__dma_request_channel'
> > pch_uart.c:(.text+0x103037): undefined reference to `dma_release_channel'
> > drivers/built-in.o: In function `pch_uart_shutdown':
> > pch_uart.c:(.text+0x103135): undefined reference to `dma_release_channel'
> > pch_uart.c:(.text+0x103151): undefined reference to `dma_release_channel'
> > make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
> > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
> > 
> 
> same patch as above.


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***