From: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>
To: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
jmorris@namei.org, eugeneteo@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kptr_restrict for hiding kernel pointers from unprivileged users
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:11:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101211001151.GS4464@outflux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292025924.2965.20.camel@Dan>
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 07:05:24PM -0500, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
> The below patch adds the %pK format specifier, the
> CONFIG_SECURITY_KPTR_RESTRICT configuration option, and the
> kptr_restrict sysctl.
>
> The %pK format specifier is designed to hide exposed kernel pointers
> from unprivileged users, specifically via /proc interfaces. Its
> behavior depends on the kptr_restrict sysctl, whose default value
> depends on CONFIG_SECURITY_KPTR_RESTRICT. If kptr_restrict is set to 0,
> no deviation from the standard %p behavior occurs. If kptr_restrict is
> set to 1, if the current user (intended to be a reader via seq_printf(),
> etc.) does not have CAP_SYSLOG (which is currently in the LSM tree),
> kernel pointers using %pK are printed as 0's. This was chosen over the
> default "(null)", which cannot be parsed by userland %p, which expects
> "(nil)".
>
> v2 improves checking for inappropriate context, on suggestion by Peter
> Zijlstra. Thanks to Thomas Graf for suggesting use of a centralized
> format specifier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
This will come in very handy! Thanks for working on this approach. :)
Acked-by: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Ubuntu Security Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-11 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-11 0:05 [PATCH v2] kptr_restrict for hiding kernel pointers from unprivileged users Dan Rosenberg
2010-12-11 0:11 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2010-12-18 0:44 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-18 1:12 ` Dan Rosenberg
2010-12-18 1:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-12-18 5:22 ` Dan Rosenberg
2010-12-18 0:53 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] <1292385983.9764.5.camel@Dan>
2010-12-15 4:18 ` Eugene Teo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101211001151.GS4464@outflux.net \
--to=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=drosenberg@vsecurity.com \
--cc=eugeneteo@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.