From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Regression] GPEs being enabled inappropriately
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 00:44:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012110044.47185.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101210175505.GA12319@srcf.ucam.org>
On Friday, December 10, 2010, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> I've just had a bug report from someone who's seeing high GPE-triggered
> load in .37. It turns out that GPEs 1B and 1E are constantly firing.
> Both have associated _L1B and _L1E methods, but they're also present in
> _PRW methods s should be disabled by default. However, part of the GPE
> rework means that we're now ignoring _PRW methods if the device they're
> associated with reports itself missing in _STA. I think we need to pay
> attention to _PRW regardless of whether or not the device is present, as
> otherwise we may be enabling GPEs that are tied to GPIOs that aren't
> connected to anything at the other end.
Below is a patch (untested) that I think should help in the majority of cases
(except for when there are devices with _PRW under the ones that are reported
to be inactive).
Thanks,
Rafael
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 96 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -705,54 +705,84 @@ static int acpi_bus_get_perf_flags(struc
}
static acpi_status
-acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(struct acpi_device *device,
- union acpi_object *package)
+acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(acpi_handle handle,
+ struct acpi_device_wakeup *wakeup)
{
- int i = 0;
+ struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
+ union acpi_object *package = NULL;
union acpi_object *element = NULL;
+ acpi_status status;
+ int i = 0;
- if (!device || !package || (package->package.count < 2))
+ if (!wakeup)
return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+ /* _PRW */
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_PRW", NULL, &buffer);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PRW"));
+ return status;
+ }
+
+ package = (union acpi_object *)buffer.pointer;
+
+ if (!package || (package->package.count < 2)) {
+ status = AE_BAD_DATA;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
element = &(package->package.elements[0]);
- if (!element)
- return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+ if (!element) {
+ status = AE_BAD_DATA;
+ goto out;
+ }
if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) {
if ((element->package.count < 2) ||
(element->package.elements[0].type !=
ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE)
- || (element->package.elements[1].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER))
- return AE_BAD_DATA;
- device->wakeup.gpe_device =
+ || (element->package.elements[1].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)) {
+ status = AE_BAD_DATA;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ wakeup->gpe_device =
element->package.elements[0].reference.handle;
- device->wakeup.gpe_number =
+ wakeup->gpe_number =
(u32) element->package.elements[1].integer.value;
} else if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
- device->wakeup.gpe_number = element->integer.value;
- } else
- return AE_BAD_DATA;
+ wakeup->gpe_number = element->integer.value;
+ } else {
+ status = AE_BAD_DATA;
+ goto out;
+ }
element = &(package->package.elements[1]);
if (element->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
- return AE_BAD_DATA;
+ status = AE_BAD_DATA;
+ goto out;
}
- device->wakeup.sleep_state = element->integer.value;
+ wakeup->sleep_state = element->integer.value;
if ((package->package.count - 2) > ACPI_MAX_HANDLES) {
- return AE_NO_MEMORY;
+ status = AE_NO_MEMORY;
+ goto out;
}
- device->wakeup.resources.count = package->package.count - 2;
- for (i = 0; i < device->wakeup.resources.count; i++) {
+ wakeup->resources.count = package->package.count - 2;
+ for (i = 0; i < wakeup->resources.count; i++) {
element = &(package->package.elements[i + 2]);
- if (element->type != ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE)
- return AE_BAD_DATA;
+ if (element->type != ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) {
+ status = AE_BAD_DATA;
+ goto out;
+ }
- device->wakeup.resources.handles[i] = element->reference.handle;
+ wakeup->resources.handles[i] = element->reference.handle;
}
- acpi_gpe_can_wake(device->wakeup.gpe_device, device->wakeup.gpe_number);
+ acpi_gpe_can_wake(wakeup->gpe_device, wakeup->gpe_number);
- return AE_OK;
+ out:
+ kfree(buffer.pointer);
+
+ return status;
}
static void acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
@@ -787,26 +817,15 @@ static void acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags(
static int acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(struct acpi_device *device)
{
acpi_status status = 0;
- struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
- union acpi_object *package = NULL;
int psw_error;
- /* _PRW */
- status = acpi_evaluate_object(device->handle, "_PRW", NULL, &buffer);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Evaluating _PRW"));
- goto end;
- }
-
- package = (union acpi_object *)buffer.pointer;
- status = acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(device, package);
+ status = acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(device->handle,
+ &device->wakeup);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Extracting _PRW package"));
goto end;
}
- kfree(buffer.pointer);
-
device->wakeup.flags.valid = 1;
device->wakeup.prepare_count = 0;
acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags(device);
@@ -1368,6 +1387,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(ac
struct acpi_bus_ops *ops = context;
int type;
unsigned long long sta;
+ struct acpi_device_wakeup wakeup;
struct acpi_device *device;
acpi_status status;
int result;
@@ -1377,8 +1397,10 @@ static acpi_status acpi_bus_check_add(ac
return AE_OK;
if (!(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_PRESENT) &&
- !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_FUNCTIONING))
+ !(sta & ACPI_STA_DEVICE_FUNCTIONING)) {
+ acpi_bus_extract_wakeup_device_power_package(handle, &wakeup);
return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
+ }
/*
* We may already have an acpi_device from a previous enumeration. If
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-10 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-10 17:55 [Regression] GPEs being enabled inappropriately Matthew Garrett
2010-12-10 23:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201012110044.47185.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.