From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog)
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:44:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101213144434.GB18577@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=bw8EcxEffbVV6CfdAPVdM25ZMxHqAmz1yukq3@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:27:02AM +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:57:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Changes since 20101209:
> >
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c:28: error: redefinition of 'touch_nmi_watchdog'
> > include/linux/nmi.h:22: note: previous definition of 'touch_nmi_watchdog' was here
I'll have to checkout that branch to see what got merged. I thought I
fixed all these. Is there a config I can use to duplicate these?
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> index c558e11..2056569 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/hw_nmi.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> void touch_nmi_watchdog(void)
> {
> touch_softlockup_watchdog();
NAK. This isn't the right patch. This chunk is in here because of
changes to nmi.h. Something broke in that file.
Cheers,
Don
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-13 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-10 2:57 linux-next: Tree for December 10 Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-10 17:25 ` linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog) Randy Dunlap
2010-12-12 5:27 ` Rakib Mullick
2010-12-12 6:26 ` Rakib Mullick
2010-12-12 7:32 ` Rakib Mullick
2010-12-13 14:44 ` Don Zickus [this message]
2010-12-13 23:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-14 15:07 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-14 5:42 ` Rakib Mullick
2010-12-13 15:37 ` Don Zickus
2010-12-13 15:55 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-12-13 19:02 ` linux-next: Tree for December 10 Zimny Lech
2010-12-13 19:04 ` Zimny Lech
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101213144434.GB18577@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rakib.mullick@gmail.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.