From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: dm: update workqueue usages Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:03:24 -0500 Message-ID: <20101214160324.GB7944@redhat.com> References: <1292181055-25696-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <4D053D49.1010605@redhat.com> <4D079205.3010204@kernel.org> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D079205.3010204@kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Tejun Heo Cc: device-mapper development , Milan Broz List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Tue, Dec 14 2010 at 10:49am -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 12/12/2010 10:23 PM, Milan Broz wrote: > > On 12/12/2010 08:10 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > > >> * I'm pretty sure workqueues in dm-crypt would benefit from using > >> multithreaded workqueue but people already seem to be working on it > >> so I left it alone. > > > > Yes, FYI it is already here with new queue api: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/agk/patches/2.6/editing/dm-crypt-scale-to-multiple-CPUs.patch > > Yeah, that looks much better. > > > (So that one chunk for dm-crypt in patch 3/6 can be dropped.) > > I'll regenerate the series w/o the chunk. BTW, against which tree > should it be generated? I'll be reviewing your workqueue patches today. I can take care of rebasing the patches as needed ontop of Alasdair's quilt tree (up to dm-raid1-support-discard.patch): http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/agk/patches/2.6/editing/series Once I've folded your patches in I will share the url for resulting quilt tree. Thanks, Mike