From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:35785 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751819Ab0LOVoI (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:44:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:44:06 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] msm: rmnet: msm rmnet smd virtual ethernet driver Message-ID: <20101215134406.3a634aa8@nehalam> In-Reply-To: <1292437866-11652-1-git-send-email-nvishwan@codeaurora.org> References: <1292437866-11652-1-git-send-email-nvishwan@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Niranjana Vishwanathapura Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Brian Swetland On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:31:06 -0800 Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote: > + > +static DECLARE_TASKLET(smd_net_data_tasklet, smd_net_data_handler, 0); > + > +static void smd_net_notify(void *_dev, unsigned event) > +{ > + if (event != SMD_EVENT_DATA) > + return; > + > + smd_net_data_tasklet.data = (unsigned long) _dev; > + > + tasklet_schedule(&smd_net_data_tasklet); > +} > + Rather than having private tasklet, maybe using NAPI would be better? Also since you are already in tasklet, no need to call netif_rx() when receiving packet; instead use netif_receive_skb directly. -- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: shemminger@vyatta.com (Stephen Hemminger) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:44:06 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] msm: rmnet: msm rmnet smd virtual ethernet driver In-Reply-To: <1292437866-11652-1-git-send-email-nvishwan@codeaurora.org> References: <1292437866-11652-1-git-send-email-nvishwan@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20101215134406.3a634aa8@nehalam> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:31:06 -0800 Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote: > + > +static DECLARE_TASKLET(smd_net_data_tasklet, smd_net_data_handler, 0); > + > +static void smd_net_notify(void *_dev, unsigned event) > +{ > + if (event != SMD_EVENT_DATA) > + return; > + > + smd_net_data_tasklet.data = (unsigned long) _dev; > + > + tasklet_schedule(&smd_net_data_tasklet); > +} > + Rather than having private tasklet, maybe using NAPI would be better? Also since you are already in tasklet, no need to call netif_rx() when receiving packet; instead use netif_receive_skb directly. --