From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:56075 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752945Ab0LOPfl (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:35:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:35:40 -0800 From: David Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] msm: io: I/O register definitions for MSM8960 Message-ID: <20101215153540.GA15817@huya.qualcomm.com> References: <1292384961-8851-1-git-send-email-stepanm@codeaurora.org> <1292384961-8851-2-git-send-email-stepanm@codeaurora.org> <201012151631.11574.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201012151631.11574.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Stepan Moskovchenko , davidb@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 04:31:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 15 December 2010, Stepan Moskovchenko wrote: > In this particular case, it's rather confusing, because one would assume > that MSM8960 is a subset of MSM8X60! Unfortunately, this is not the case, and I'm not sure what better name to use for MSM8X60. The MSM8X60 name covers MSM8260 and MSM8660, but MSM8960 is quite a bit different. Any ideas for better names? David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: davidb@codeaurora.org (David Brown) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:35:40 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/7] msm: io: I/O register definitions for MSM8960 In-Reply-To: <201012151631.11574.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1292384961-8851-1-git-send-email-stepanm@codeaurora.org> <1292384961-8851-2-git-send-email-stepanm@codeaurora.org> <201012151631.11574.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <20101215153540.GA15817@huya.qualcomm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 04:31:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 15 December 2010, Stepan Moskovchenko wrote: > In this particular case, it's rather confusing, because one would assume > that MSM8960 is a subset of MSM8X60! Unfortunately, this is not the case, and I'm not sure what better name to use for MSM8X60. The MSM8X60 name covers MSM8260 and MSM8660, but MSM8960 is quite a bit different. Any ideas for better names? David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.