Re: [PATCH 1/2] MSM: Add USB suport for QSD8x50

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 09:11:42AM +0530, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On 12/15/2010 10:47 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On 12/8/2010 1:37 PM, Pavankumar Kondeti wrote:
> >>>> > > > OTG driver takes care of putting hardware into low power mode.  Hence
> >>>> > > > make peripheral and host devices as children of OTG device and let
> >>>> > > > runtime PM takes care of notifying peripheral and host state to
> >>>> > > > OTG device.  VBUS power up and shutdown routines are implemented by
> >>>> > > > modem processor.  As RPC infrastructure is not available, configure
> >>>> > > > USB in peripheral only mode.
> >>>> > > > 
> >>>> > > > Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
> >>>> > > > ---
> >>>> > > > This patch depends on [PATCH V3 00/11] Add MSM USB controller driver
> >>>> > > > patch series which is under review.
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > USB driver patches are taken into Greg KH usb-next tree. Is it possible
> >>> > > to include this patch for 2.6.38?
> >> > 
> >> > I don't control Greg's tree, so I don't know what his policies are
> >> > regarding patch acceptance ..
> > They are like any other patch acceptance rules, what specifically is the
> > issue here?
> 
> The board support patches ( [PATCH 1/2] MSM: Add USB suport for QSD8x50)
> are dependent on USB OTG driver patches ([PATCH V3 00/11] Add MSM USB
> controller driver). The USB OTG driver patches are in your
> usb-next tree. Where should board support patches go? MSM tree/ USB tree?

MSM tree would make sense, right?

thanks,

greg k-h