From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] input: touchscreen: introduce tsc2005 driver Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:50:49 -0800 Message-ID: <20101217175048.GP5941@atomide.com> References: <1290699913-26540-1-git-send-email-ext-srikar.1.bhavanarayana@nokia.com> <20101213085143.GE21401@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D088CC0.9080402@nokia.com> <20101216075716.GD26567@core.coreip.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:41289 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755237Ab0LQRu5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:50:57 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101216075716.GD26567@core.coreip.homeip.net> Sender: linux-input-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-input@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Srikar , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, lauri.leukkunen@nokia.com, aaro.koskinen@nokia.com, ext-phil.2.carmody@nokia.com, David Brownell , Imre Deak , Hiroshi DOYU , Ari Kauppi , Jarkko Nikula , Eero Nurkkala , Roman Tereshonkov * Dmitry Torokhov [101215 23:57]: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:39:12AM +0200, Srikar wrote: > > Hi ToroKhov, > > TSC2005 is using SPI interface/driver and TSC2007 driver > > is using i2C Interface/driver are main differences. > > I see. In this case I believe that, instead of creating completely > separate driver, we need to abstract bus access from tsc2007 and convert > the driver into tsc200x-core.c core piece and tcs2005.c/tsc2007.c > implementing just bus access methods. Pretty much what was done for > ad714x, adxl34x, ad7879 and other drivers. > > > I have a question, Can I release patch to input for enabling the driver > > tsc2005 located at *arch/arm/mach-omap2/* > > > > As commented below by Tony Lindgren, > > This does not exist in mainline yet, please send this patch > > along with the tsc2005 driver via the input list. For this one: > > > > I am not sure what this means... If you want to submit parts of platform > code through my tree that should be fine as long as respective > maintainer of given arch is OK with it as well. Yeah the platform code depends on the tsc2005 header which does not exist in the mainline kernel yet. I think I already acked the platform related code to be merged via the input list. Regards, Tony