From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter =?utf-8?q?H=C3=BCwe?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: Fix recursive Kconfig dependency Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:00:14 +0100 Message-ID: <201012192000.14969.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> References: <1291850970-7190-1-git-send-email-peterhuewe@gmx.de> <201012152214.29452.PeterHuewe@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:37660 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932375Ab0LSTAW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:00:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Stephen Rothwell Cc: Randy Dunlap , Corentin Chary , Matthew Garrett , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, John Linville Am Freitag 17 Dezember 2010, 12:30:15 schrieb Sedat Dilek: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Peter H=C3=BCwe = wrote: > > Am Mittwoch 15 Dezember 2010, 21:51:04 schrieb Randy Dunlap: > >> > Hi, another patch was posted before: > >> >=20 > >> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.platform.x86.devel/= 970/ma > >> > tch =3Dacpi_wmi > >> >Acked-by: Randy Dunlap > >=20 > > Yeah, you're right - but as Sedat's patch is perfect (and fixes bot= h) - > > so for Sedats's patch: > > Acked-by: Peter Huewe > >=20 > > Thanks, > > Peter >=20 > [ CC John Linville ] >=20 > It's a bit disappointing to see my fix is still not in > platform-drivers-x86/linux-next [1] (even it's only fixing "warnings"= , > 9 days past). > linux-next tree is for me a very high dynamic SCM tree, I am doing > mostly daily builds, at weekend I am testing/pulling other trees > before they go into Monday's linux-next. > As far as I have fun with "my process"... I will continue. Added Stephen Rothwell on CC, maybe he can apply it directly to linux-n= ext ;) Peter