From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35133 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PUkPO-0003nB-1G
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:24:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mtosatti@redhat.com>) id 1PUkPM-0005p3-J1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:24:29 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8525)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mtosatti@redhat.com>) id 1PUkPM-0005ob-Aj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:24:28 -0500
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:23:13 -0200
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20101220182312.GA31657@amt.cnet>
References: <20101208170858.GA10056@amt.cnet>
	<20101212191129.GA20312@morn.localdomain>
	<20101212194916.GD28665@redhat.com>
	<20101212195745.GA23475@morn.localdomain>
	<20101220084948.GA16707@amt.cnet> <4D0F1EBC.9050205@redhat.com>
	<20101220170501.GA30587@amt.cnet> <4D0F95EC.2060300@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4D0F95EC.2060300@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [SeaBIOS] seabios: acpi: add _RMV control method
	for PCI devices
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>, seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 07:44:12PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/20/2010 07:05 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >>  >
> >>  >Yes, perhaps it all (including PCI hotplug controller) should be using
> >>  >something else than hardcoded IO ports, but thats what we have now.
> >>
> >>  At least it should be documented.
> >>
> >>  What's the behaviour with a qemu that doesn't support the new port?
> >>  We don't strictly support it, but let's do so if we can.
> >
> >All slots will be marked as hotpluggable (since the "removability" IO port will not be
> >registered and return all 1's).
> >
> 
> Good, so compatibility is retained.  seabios will know not to
> allocate this address to pci bars?

seabios starts allocating at 0xc000, which is past the hardcoded
addresses.

In any case, qemu will abort on registration if there are conflicts.