From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alasdair G Kergon Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:06:30 +0000 Subject: Release tarballs location In-Reply-To: <20101222144901.5d2bb8c7@surf> References: <20101222144901.5d2bb8c7@surf> Message-ID: <20101222150630.GC19761@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> List-Id: To: lvm-devel@redhat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit If a release was moved to 'old' it generally means it's not one I recommend you run - a newer release is a better one to use. In general, the versions left there are the ones that showed themselves to be more stable. When I did this week's release and removed the previous release (it's a memory corruption bug in it) I started thinking about what we could do to document this a bit better. Yes, I could put them all directly into 'old' to deal with this immediate problem - good idea. Alasdair