All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:23:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101222152309.GA30670@elliptictech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201012212354.06895.arnd@arndb.de>

On 2010-12-21 23:54 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 22 November 2010 16:17:23 Nick Bowler wrote:
> > On 2010-11-21 09:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Yes, I'd be ok with UDF doing a "select BKL" along with a "default n"
> > > for BKL itself.
> > > 
> > > I think UDF currently is the only sane reason to have BKL enabled any
> > > more, and yes, it would probably make it easier to configure things.
> > 
> > UFS (which I use) also relies on BKL.
> 
> Would you mind running a kernel with this patch and lockdep enabled then?

I will definitely try it, but I probably won't get around to it before
the new year.

Thanks,

-- 
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-22 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-17 15:26 [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-17 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-17 15:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] staging/stradis: mark as "depends on BKL" Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-17 16:03   ` Greg KH
2010-11-17 15:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i810: remove the BKL Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-17 15:26   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-17 15:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] BKL: remove extraneous #include <smp_lock.h> Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-17 15:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] BKL: remove references to lock_kernel from comments Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-17 15:40   ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-11-17 15:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] BKL: disable by default Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-17 15:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] BKL: mark lock_kernel as deprecated Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-17 15:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] BKL: move CONFIG_BKL to staging Arnd Bergmann
2010-11-18 23:34 ` [PATCH 0/7] BKL removal follow-up Jan Kara
2010-11-18 23:40   ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-18 23:40     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-21 14:12     ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-11-21 14:12       ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-11-21 17:45       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-21 17:45         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-22 15:17         ` Nick Bowler
2010-12-21 22:54           ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-22 15:23             ` Nick Bowler [this message]
2010-12-24 11:04             ` Evgeniy Dushistov
2010-12-30 14:58               ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-12-30 15:16                 ` Evgeniy Dushistov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101222152309.GA30670@elliptictech.com \
    --to=nbowler@elliptictech.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dushistov@mail.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.