From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 V13] RO/NX protection for loadable kernel Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:49:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20101223084908.GA21946@elte.hu> References: <4CE2F914.9070106@free.fr> <24422.1290656467@localhost> <20101126182355.62615dff@mat-laptop> <20101208221951.GO5750@outflux.net> <20101211001857.4c5e0794@mat-laptop> <20101222124019.GG10809@elte.hu> <34428.1293053719@localhost> <20101222215725.GB5585@elte.hu> <1293055346.22802.0.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1293055346.22802.0.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, mat , Kees Cook , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven , James Morris , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Rusty Russell , Stephen Rothwell , Dave Jones , Siarhei Liakh List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org * Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 22:57 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > It would be nice to see that fix submitted so that it gets into the tree that > > introduced the bug. > > > > Steve, Andrew? > > Hi Ingo, > > Which tree/branch should I base this on? Please use tip:x86/security, it contains the RO/NX patches: 691513f70d39: x86: Resume trampoline must be executable 84e1c6bb38eb: x86: Add RO/NX protection for loadable kernel modules 5bd5a452662b: x86: Add NX protection for kernel data 64edc8ed5ffa: x86: Fix improper large page preservation > [...] I could do write up formal patch and push it out. Thanks! Ingo